Different approaches to historical characters

In Regeneration, Barker had used the historical figures to represent and convey messages that criticises society. The same is done in CCM, where Bierniers uses historical figures such as Carlo to represent the shunned affect of being a homosexual. However, as both authors use these figures to convey the same message, they are portraying a different representation of each character. For example; Barker's portayal of Rivers, Sassoon and Graves are of strong, and bold/'big' characters within the novel. They are seen as patriachal as well as influencing the dynamic events in the novel. However, Biernieres had used Carlo to portray a very timid, emotional and reflective character. In other words, Biernieres had allowed Carlo to be a more feminine character rather than a bold character like that Barker would have done.

Another noticeable point on how these authors approach their characters differently are; Barker using a more conservative and passive mockery of historical figures or attitudes, unlike Biernieres who openly mocks these character to show his disagreements. This is shown through the dramatic monologue of chapter 2 in CCM (The Duce), here he had portrayed Mussolini as a mad man who was humourous to the reader because the character was utterly whimsical and irrational. As for Barker, the representation of social mockery was done in a more seriouse manner through the character of Yealland; an arrogant, domineering and cruel character.